The away goals rule is a method of tiebreaking in association football and early sports when teams play each other twice, once at each team ‘s home ground. By the away goals rule, the team that has scored more goals “ away from home “ wins, if the total goals scored by each team are otherwise adequate. This is sometimes expressed by saying that aside goals “ count double ” in the event of a connect, [ 1 ] though in commit the team with more away goals is just recorded as the winner, preferably than having extra or ‘double ‘ goals added to their total. The away goals govern is most often invoked in two-leg fixtures, where the initial resultant role is determined by the aggregate sexual conquest — i.e. the scores of both games are added together. In many competitions, the away goals dominion is the first base tie-breaker in such cases, with a penalty gunfight as the second tie-breaker if each team has scored the same number of away goals. Rules vary as to whether the aside goals principle applies only to the conclusion of normal fourth dimension of the second leg, or applies in excess prison term as well. It was first gear introduced by UEFA in the 1965–66 european Cup Winners ‘ Cup. On 24 June 2021, UEFA approved the marriage proposal to abolish the away goals convention in all UEFA club competitions from the 2021–22 season. [ 2 ]
explanation [edit ]
Example A
Reading: Away goals rule
- In the first leg, the final score is: Team A (Home) 1–0 Team B (Away).
- In the second leg, the final score is: Team A (Away) 0–1 Team B (Home).
In this case, the aggregate score is 1–1, but as neither team scored an away goal, the match will progress to the following tie-breaker, excess time. Example B
- In the first leg, the final score is: Team A (Home) 1–0 Team B (Away).
- In the second leg, the final score is: Team A (Away) 1–2 Team B (Home).
In this case, the aggregate grade is 2–2. however, because Team A scored an away goal in the second leg while team B, in the beginning leg, did not, Team A will progress to the next stage of the competition as they scored more away goals than team B. Example C In the inaugural leg, the final score is : team A ( Home ) 1–0 team B ( Away ) .
- First leg: Team A (Home) 1–0 Team B (Away).
In the irregular leg, the concluding sexual conquest goes as follows :
- Second leg, after 90 minutes: Team A (Away) 0–1 Team B (Home).
- Second leg, after extra time: Team A (Away) 1–2 Team B (Home).
In this case, the aggregate mark is 1–1 after 90 minutes in the second base leg and neither team has scored an aside goal, the catch goes into extra prison term. After extra meter the scores remain level 2–2 on aggregate, but Team A has nowadays scored an away goal and will frankincense progress to the future stage of the competition, as they scored more away goals than team B. Example D In the first gear leg, the final examination score is : team A ( Home ) 1–0 team B ( Away ) .
- First leg: Team A (Home) 1–0 Team B (Away).
In the second leg, the final score goes as follows :
- Second leg, after 90 minutes: Team A (Away) 0–1 Team B (Home).
- Second leg, after extra time: Team A (Away) 1–2 Team B (Home).
In this example, the sum grade is 1–1 after 90 minutes in the second leg and neither team has scored an away finish, the match goes into extra time. After extra time the scores remain degree 2–2 on aggregate, and Team A has now scored an off goal. however, unlike in case C, the away goals rule does not apply in extra time, and the match will progress to a penalty gunfight. Example E In the beginning leg, the concluding score is : team A ( Home ) 1–0 team B ( Away ) .
- First leg: Team A (Home) 1–0 Team B (Away).
In the second leg, the final examination score goes as follows :
- Second leg, after 90 minutes: Team A (Away) 0–1 Team B (Home).
- Second leg, after extra time: Team A (Away) 0–1 Team B (Home).
In this example, the aggregate score is 1–1, but as neither team scored an away goal, the match will progress to the adjacent tie-breaker, extra time and since no far goals are scored there, the match will progress to a punishment gunfight .
rationale [edit ]
primitively, the away finish rule was introduced in football as an expedite way of doing away with playoffs or tie breakers on neutral grounds to resolve a logistic, physical and calendar trouble when two teams were so close matched the final score over the two legs remained in absolute parity, which could remain flush after a third gear game tie surf. The away goals dominion is intended to encourage the away team to be more aggressive. In football, at least, it can lead to a anxious beginning leg : the family team is unwilling to commit large numbers of players to attack less to avoid conceding an away goal, whilst the aside team attempts to snatch an away goal to aid them in the moment leg. such tactics arguably make the second leg more exciting, after a low-scoring first base leg leaves both sides with a prospect to win. There are sometimes debates [ by whom? ] over whether the away goals rule gives an unfair advantage to the team playing off first — with the other team squandering their home advantage in the first leg due to away finish fears — and this may be a factor in its somewhat patchy adoption for competitions. [ citation needed ] The rule can besides make the game more stimulate as normally one goal can entirely make the remainder between losing and drawing, or between drawing and winning, but with the away goals rule, one goal can make the difference between losing and winning. There is besides the write out that if extra time is played in the second branch, the away team gets an extra 30 minutes to take advantage of the away goals predominate. This can be countered by the fact that in extra time, the home team has the advantage of playing the excess 30 minutes at home. In addition, normally, the dwelling team had made a better political campaign in the group phase, which would naturally give it some advantage over the away team.
Read more: Aaron Wan-Bissaka
anecdotal attest suggests that most teams feel an aside goal puts them in the drive seat, such as Liverpool being able to draw 1–1 at Arsenal in the 2007–08 UEFA Champions League quarterfinals ; Liverpool did eliminate Arsenal to advance to the semi-finals. [ 3 ] Liverpool won the second game 4–2, making the aggregate score for the marry Liverpool 5–3 Arsenal, consequently, the away goal scored by Liverpool in the foremost leg was not required. [ 4 ] many commentators have described the importance of a team being able to score an aside goal, even when losing that leg of the tie, as it mathematically does give that team a gamble to redeem itself on home dirt by leveling the tie on aggregate while using the away finish as a tiebreaker. [ 5 ] For example, in the 2007 UEFA Champions League round of 16, while Bayern Munich lost the first leg 3–2 at Real Madrid, Bayern former won 2–1 at home to level the tie on aggregate, but it was Bayern ‘s away goals scored during their first gear leg loss that let them advance. [ 6 ] In the 2009–10 UEFA Champions League, Bayern Munich won both round of 16 and quarter-finals on the off finish rule after drawing 4–4 on sum, by winning 2–1 at home and losing 3–2 away, against Fiorentina and Manchester United respectively. [ 7 ] In the 2012–13 UEFA Champions League semi-finals, despite falling 4–1 in the first leg at Borussia Dortmund, Real Madrid would have been able to advance if at home it managed to hold Dortmund to 3–0 ; during the moment leg Real Madrid scored two goals in the last ten minutes but were unable to score the third gear goal that would have sent them through to the final ( Dortmund advanced 4–3 on aggregate ). In the early semi-final, however, after Barcelona were defeated off by Bayern Munich 4–0, commentators considered Barcelona basically eliminated because Bayern could seal the affiliation by scoring one away goal even if Barcelona managed to score five goals ( Bayern managed a 3–0 succeed in the second leg to advance 7–0 on aggregate ). [ 8 ] The away goals convention can result in the “ lead ” of the two-legged link swinging back and forth. For case, in the 2004–05 UEFA Champions League round of 16 between Barcelona and Chelsea, Barcelona were ahead on aggregate after a 2–1 winnings in the first peg at base. During the second leg held in London, Chelsea foremost scored three straight goals to take the lead on aggregate ( 4–2 ), but Barcelona responded with two goals to level the aggregate score at 4–4 while taking the lead on away goals ( 2–1 ). Chelsea scored again, though, to advance on sum, 5–4. [ 9 ] In the 2018–19 UEFA Champions League semi-finals between Tottenham Hotspur and Ajax, Ajax led the tie from the 15th minute of the first leg ( in a 1–0 away victory in London ) until the 95th infinitesimal of the second leg ( at that detail inactive up 3–2 on aggregate ), when Tottenham ‘s Lucas Moura completed a hat-trick in Amsterdam that leveled the aggregate score at 3–3 while eliminating Ajax, 3–1, on away goals. [ 10 ] [ 11 ] [ 12 ]
custom [edit ]
The away goals rule is applied in many football competitions that involve two-leg fixtures, including the knockout stages of the CAF Champions League, CAF Confederation Cup and any two-legged playoffs in reservation for the FIFA World Cup or european Championships. From 2014 until 2018, Major League Soccer in the U.S. and Canada used the away goals rule in the MLS Cup Playoffs, in which the conference semi-finals and finals ( the quarterfinals and semi-finals of the overall tournament ) were two-legged. [ 13 ] The rule was first applied in this rival when the Seattle Sounders defeated FC Dallas in the 2014 westerly Conference semi-finals. In the 2019 MLS temper, two-legged ties were eliminated in favor of a single-elimination knockout format throughout the integral playoffs. [ 14 ] In the Liga MX, the away goals principle has constantly applied to the playoffs games. This was besides applied to the final games until the 1995–96 temper where Necaxa all in Celaya F.C. . In those games, Necaxa was able to pull a 1–1 tie in the game in Celaya, then the team was able to hold a 0–0 tie in Azteca Stadium to win the championship. After that final, the away goals rule was retired from the final plot and in case of a tie after the two games, it will be pushed to extra time and penalty gunfight if needed, as happened in the Invierno 1999 season where Atlas F.C. and Deportivo Toluca where tied 5–5 at the end of the second game ( that would give Toluca the backing by aside goals ) but it was pulled to extra prison term and penalty gunfight where Toluca beat Atlas 5–3 to win the championship. In CONMEBOL competitions before 2005, for exemplar the Copa Libertadores, neither away goals rule nor extra clock were used in any competition. Ties that were level on sum went to an immediate penalty gunfight. Since 2005, two-legged ties have been decided on points, followed by goal remainder and the away goals rule ; if the resultant role is distillery tied, the penalty gunfight is used. The Copa Libertadores finals became the alone exception to the away goals dominion and besides only in the finals is employed extra time. In Latin America, an model of a tournament that used the away goal rule was the Copa do Brasil ( Brazil Cup ) until the 2017 edition. The away goals convention is sometimes used in round-robin competitions ( that is, leagues or qualifying groups ), where it may be used to break ties involving more than two teams. For exercise, away goals are the third gear tiebreaker in the group stage of both the UEFA Champions League [ 15 ] and UEFA Cup. [ 16 ] In Group C of the UEFA Champions League 2000–01, Olympique Lyonnais took the second qualify topographic point ahead of Olympiacos on away goals. [ 17 ] Because other tiebreakers take priority, the away goals rule is rarely invoked in such tournaments. In many group tournaments, the away goals rule is never applicable ; for case, in World Cup qualification. [ 18 ] The away goals principle was beginning applied in the UEFA Cup Winners ‘ Cup when Budapest Honvéd beat Dukla Prague in the second round in 1965–66. It was introduced in the Fairs Cup in 1966–67, [ 19 ] and in the european Cup in 1967–68 for the first gear rung, [ 20 ] 1968–69 for the second round, [ 21 ] and 1970–71 for later rounds. [ 22 ] Previously, ties level on sum had gone to a playoff on neutral ground. [ 23 ] On 24 June 2021, UEFA approved the proposal to abolish the away goals principle in all UEFA club competitions from the 2021–22 season. [ 24 ] [ 25 ]
Anomalies [edit ]
If the two clubs contesting a two-legged repair share the same stadium, each club may be the home club in one leg, and the rule may still apply. For example, the 2003 UEFA Champions League semi-finals drew Inter Milan and A.C. Milan together. Both legs were played at the San Siro, their shared stadium in milan :
- First leg: A.C. Milan 0–0 Inter Milan
- Second leg: Inter Milan 1–1 A.C. Milan
With an aggregate of 1–1, A.C. Milan was declared the winner because they were the “ away ” side in the second gear crippled. In this exercise, as in many such cases, most tickets for each leg will be reserved for the “ home ” side ‘s fans, so the designation was not wholly arbitrary. not all competitions with the away goals rule suffer from this anomaly, however : the Copa do Brasil has developed its rules to avoid some anomalies, such as the above. In that Cup, if two teams plowshare either the same stadium or the same home town, neither is considered the home plate golf club and frankincense the away goals rule does not apply. This exception was seen, for exemplar, in the 2006 final between Flamengo and Vasco, when both legs were played at the Maracanã Stadium. More anomalous was a qualification play-off for the 1991 World Youth Championship between Australia and Israel : Australia won on away goals even though, due to security concerns arising from the First Intifada, Israel ‘s “ home ” leg was played in Australia. [ 26 ] The like site occurred in the 2010 FIFA World Cup qualification necktie between the Bahamas and the british Virgin Islands, when the Bahamas advanced on the away goals rule even though both legs were played in the Bahamas. [ 27 ] There has been at least one casing of a wrong lotion of the away goals rule by a referee in an international golf club tournament. It happened in a second-round bind in the 1971–72 european Cup Winners ‘ Cup between Rangers and Sporting Clube de Portugal. This fastness had the play along scorelines :
- First leg: Rangers 3–2 Sporting
- Second leg, after 90 minutes: Sporting 3–2 Rangers
- Second leg, after extra time: Sporting 4–3 Rangers
Since the teams were now horizontal surface 6–6 on sum, the Dutch referee Laurens avant-garde Raavens ordered a penalty gunfight, which Sporting won 3–0. Rangers appealed the loss, however, on the grounds that Van Raavens should not have ordered the gunfight, since the Rangers goal in extra time in Lisbon gave them a lead of three away goals to two. Rangers won the appeal and went on to win the Cup Winners ‘ Cup that season. CONCACAF used a different predominate for its CONCACAF Champions League, employing away goals at the end of regulation of the second leg but not applying the convention at the end of extra time. It has since abolished extra time in that tournament with penalty kicks used if teams are even on goals and away goals after both legs. MLS adopted this version of the rule for its playoffs in 2014. [ 13 ] For example, the semifinal of the 2008–09 CONCACAF Champions League between Cruz Azul and the Puerto Rico Islanders had the trace scorelines :
- First leg: Puerto Rico Islanders 2–0 Cruz Azul
- Second leg, after 90 minutes: Cruz Azul 2–0 Puerto Rico Islanders
- Second leg, after extra time: Cruz Azul 3–1 Puerto Rico Islanders
Since CONCACAF does not apply the away goals predominate for goals scored in extra time, the crippled went to a penalty gunfight, which Cruz Azul won 4–2.
Read more: S.S. Lazio
The away goals rule can besides apply to confiscate matches. celtic lost their away tie to Legia Warsaw 4–1 in the 2014–15 UEFA Champions League third base qualifying rung. In their home leg, Legia brought on an ineligible player which mechanically gave Celtic a 3–0 succeed. The forfeit meant that the tie ended 4–4, meaning Celtic qualified to the following round, 1–0, on away goals. [ 28 ] The off goals rule can besides apply to matches played behind closed doors. Both legs of the 2020–21 UEFA Champions League Round of 16 contest between Porto and Juventus were played without fans in attendance due to the COVID-19 pandemic. [ 29 ] Porto won the foremost leg 2–1 at home and trailed the second leg by the lapp mark after rule. Both teams scored a goal in extra time and Porto went through, 2–1, on away goals. [ 30 ] In the same 2020–21 season, Paris Saint-Germain qualified to the semi-finals, despite drawing 3–3 on aggregate against Bayern Munich, having scored more aside goals than their opposition. [ 31 ]
compendious [edit ]
Below is a summary of the variations of rules and examples of current competitions using the away goals govern for two legged-ties. In most examples in the postpone below, a penalty shoot-out is used to determine the winner if all criteria used remain tie. The exception is the Liga MX play-offs ( except final ), where the team having the better regular season record, wins the tie if the sum score and away goals are both level. however, in the Liga MX play-off final, neither the aside goals rule nor the regular season record is applied as tie-breakers, and if tied after regulation and extra time, the penalty shoot-out is used to determine the achiever .